Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1027

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 07:12, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Mm9::chr10:57504665..57504709,+ p2@Fabp7
Mm9::chr13:83869149..83869189,- p2@ENSMUST00000171323
p2@uc011zcg.1
Mm9::chr3:34552508..34552515,+ p@chr3:34552508..34552515
+
Mm9::chr4:97251271..97251292,- p1@E130114P18Rik
Mm9::chr4:97251303..97251334,- p1@ENSMUST00000107068
p1@ENSMUST00000126721
p1@ENSMUST00000147925
p1@ENSMUST00000151946
Mm9::chr5:67359660..67359686,+ p7@Limch1
Mm9::chr5:67359771..67359785,+ p9@Limch1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median
Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ectoderm-derived structure9.82e-3395
ectoderm9.82e-3395
presumptive ectoderm9.82e-3395
nervous system5.55e-3175
central nervous system1.04e-3073
neurectoderm2.47e-2864
neural plate2.47e-2864
presumptive neural plate2.47e-2864
ecto-epithelium1.49e-2673
regional part of nervous system2.29e-2154
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.58e-2192
pre-chordal neural plate4.59e-2149
neural tube1.47e-2052
neural rod1.47e-2052
future spinal cord1.47e-2052
neural keel1.47e-2052
brain5.10e-1847
future brain5.10e-1847
regional part of brain2.67e-1746
gray matter2.85e-1734
anterior neural tube9.23e-1640
regional part of forebrain2.81e-1539
forebrain2.81e-1539
future forebrain2.81e-1539
brain grey matter7.53e-1529
regional part of telencephalon7.53e-1529
telencephalon7.53e-1529
cerebral cortex4.05e-1121
cerebral hemisphere4.05e-1121
pallium4.05e-1121
multi-cellular organism1.00e-09333
regional part of cerebral cortex8.40e-0917
embryo3.18e-07320
tissue5.08e-07349


TFBS overrepresentationSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}