Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2296: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C2296_pineal_temporal_occipital_parietal_duodenum_spinal_optic

Latest revision as of 12:02, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2296_pineal_temporal_occipital_parietal_duodenum_spinal_optic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:48006773..48006777,-p@chr14:48006773..48006777
-
Hg19::chr14:48144799..48144820,-p@chr14:48144799..48144820
-
Hg19::chr1:178340501..178340532,+p@chr1:178340501..178340532
+
Hg19::chr4:165305086..165305179,-p2@MARCH1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube8.46e-7056
neural rod8.46e-7056
future spinal cord8.46e-7056
neural keel8.46e-7056
central nervous system3.02e-6781
regional part of nervous system1.21e-6553
regional part of brain1.21e-6553
nervous system6.69e-6489
brain1.22e-5868
future brain1.22e-5868
neurectoderm6.26e-5886
neural plate2.21e-5682
presumptive neural plate2.21e-5682
regional part of forebrain2.58e-5441
forebrain2.58e-5441
anterior neural tube2.58e-5441
future forebrain2.58e-5441
pre-chordal neural plate5.99e-4761
brain grey matter1.60e-4534
gray matter1.60e-4534
telencephalon2.47e-4534
ecto-epithelium2.20e-44104
cerebral hemisphere3.72e-4332
regional part of telencephalon6.78e-4332
ectoderm-derived structure1.60e-39171
ectoderm1.60e-39171
presumptive ectoderm1.60e-39171
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.54e-37132
cerebral cortex3.83e-3425
pallium3.83e-3425
regional part of cerebral cortex3.84e-3222
adult organism9.74e-31114
neocortex1.14e-2920
organ system subdivision4.64e-27223
posterior neural tube5.15e-1615
chordal neural plate5.15e-1615
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.11e-1313
anatomical cluster2.63e-13373
tube5.80e-13192
basal ganglion1.07e-129
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.07e-129
aggregate regional part of brain1.07e-129
collection of basal ganglia1.07e-129
cerebral subcortex1.07e-129
neural nucleus1.25e-129
nucleus of brain1.25e-129
segmental subdivision of hindbrain2.88e-1212
hindbrain2.88e-1212
presumptive hindbrain2.88e-1212
temporal lobe1.21e-106
diencephalon3.63e-107
future diencephalon3.63e-107
telencephalic nucleus4.11e-107
multi-tissue structure1.03e-09342
gyrus1.07e-096
organ part1.33e-09218
anatomical conduit4.78e-09240
brainstem6.01e-096
regional part of metencephalon7.31e-099
metencephalon7.31e-099
future metencephalon7.31e-099
occipital lobe1.80e-085
parietal lobe2.47e-085
epithelium2.79e-08306
cell layer5.23e-08309
limbic system5.98e-085
embryo2.99e-07592
regional part of diencephalon7.65e-074
gland of diencephalon8.82e-074
neuroendocrine gland8.82e-074
corpus striatum9.08e-074
striatum9.08e-074
ventral part of telencephalon9.08e-074
future corpus striatum9.08e-074


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0938548
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.11.31813
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.244769
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.709734
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.125954
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.28333
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.11.18043
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.656404
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.11.63368
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.10559
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.640035
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.12.08227
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.476674
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTBP2#1488231.35850016966410.001492676882047230.00953886562345534



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.