Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1571

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:58, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1571_renal_parietal_insula_occipital_temporal_duodenum_mesothelioma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:14278992..14278993,-p@chr10:14278992..14278993
-
Hg19::chr10:14283679..14283683,-p@chr10:14283679..14283683
-
Hg19::chr10:14302020..14302023,-p@chr10:14302020..14302023
-
Hg19::chr10:14372855..14372869,-p10@FRMD4A
Hg19::chr10:14372870..14372944,-p2@FRMD4A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
mesothelial cell6.86e-0819
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube5.52e-6456
neural rod5.52e-6456
future spinal cord5.52e-6456
neural keel5.52e-6456
regional part of nervous system1.12e-5753
regional part of brain1.12e-5753
telencephalon4.03e-5734
cerebral hemisphere4.83e-5732
brain grey matter5.24e-5734
gray matter5.24e-5734
regional part of cerebral cortex1.61e-5622
regional part of telencephalon1.42e-5232
neocortex2.91e-5120
central nervous system2.13e-5081
regional part of forebrain1.21e-4941
forebrain1.21e-4941
anterior neural tube1.21e-4941
future forebrain1.21e-4941
cerebral cortex3.19e-4925
pallium3.19e-4925
brain1.24e-4768
future brain1.24e-4768
nervous system2.70e-4489
neural plate1.13e-4282
presumptive neural plate1.13e-4282
neurectoderm3.40e-4086
pre-chordal neural plate4.50e-3361
ecto-epithelium2.18e-31104
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.20e-27132
adult organism8.22e-26114
ectoderm-derived structure5.37e-19171
ectoderm5.37e-19171
presumptive ectoderm5.37e-19171
gyrus2.73e-176
tube6.57e-16192
organ system subdivision1.38e-15223
brainstem5.42e-156
temporal lobe5.74e-156
posterior neural tube5.97e-1515
chordal neural plate5.97e-1515
occipital lobe9.31e-155
limbic system1.13e-145
parietal lobe1.91e-145
anatomical conduit1.49e-10240
basal ganglion1.50e-109
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.50e-109
aggregate regional part of brain1.50e-109
collection of basal ganglia1.50e-109
cerebral subcortex1.50e-109
neural nucleus5.93e-109
nucleus of brain5.93e-109
frontal cortex1.74e-093
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.87e-0912
hindbrain1.87e-0912
presumptive hindbrain1.87e-0912
anatomical cluster5.23e-09373
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.19e-0813
pons2.33e-083
medulla oblongata2.58e-083
myelencephalon2.58e-083
future myelencephalon2.58e-083
spinal cord3.26e-083
dorsal region element3.26e-083
dorsum3.26e-083
epithelium1.27e-07306
cell layer1.91e-07309
middle temporal gyrus5.16e-072
amygdala5.31e-072
middle frontal gyrus5.95e-072
multi-tissue structure6.93e-07342
Ammon's horn7.90e-072
lobe parts of cerebral cortex7.90e-072
hippocampal formation7.90e-072
limbic lobe7.90e-072


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.