Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2791

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:34, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2791_iPS_medial_leiomyoma_smallcell_Neurons_Smooth_mixed



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:41259637..41259665,+p@chr4:41259637..41259665
+
Hg19::chr4:41259677..41259717,+p@chr4:41259677..41259717
+
Hg19::chr4:41270044..41270055,+p@chr4:41270044..41270055
+
Hg19::chr4:41270098..41270123,+p@chr4:41270098..41270123
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cell layer8.82e-21312
epithelium8.90e-21309
regional part of nervous system9.04e-2194
nervous system9.04e-2194
central nervous system4.57e-1982
tube1.12e-18194
organism subdivision2.71e-17365
anatomical conduit1.16e-15241
brain3.27e-1569
future brain3.27e-1569
neural tube2.06e-1357
neural rod2.06e-1357
future spinal cord2.06e-1357
neural keel2.06e-1357
somite2.12e-1383
paraxial mesoderm2.12e-1383
presomitic mesoderm2.12e-1383
presumptive segmental plate2.12e-1383
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.12e-1383
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.12e-1383
regional part of brain2.22e-1359
anatomical cluster3.26e-13286
dermomyotome9.35e-1370
neurectoderm1.01e-1290
neural plate1.71e-1286
presumptive neural plate1.71e-1286
skeletal muscle tissue4.83e-1261
striated muscle tissue4.83e-1261
myotome4.83e-1261
gray matter1.18e-1134
brain grey matter1.18e-1134
artery1.32e-1142
arterial blood vessel1.32e-1142
arterial system1.32e-1142
multi-tissue structure1.39e-11347
muscle tissue1.57e-1163
musculature1.57e-1163
musculature of body1.57e-1163
multi-cellular organism4.24e-11659
cerebral hemisphere5.70e-1132
regional part of forebrain5.97e-1141
forebrain5.97e-1141
future forebrain5.97e-1141
anterior neural tube7.00e-1142
telencephalon1.27e-1034
pre-chordal neural plate1.32e-1061
ectoderm1.60e-10173
presumptive ectoderm1.60e-10173
head1.75e-10123
regional part of telencephalon1.80e-1033
trunk mesenchyme2.59e-10143
vasculature2.71e-1079
vascular system2.71e-1079
ectoderm-derived structure3.18e-10169
systemic artery3.76e-1033
systemic arterial system3.76e-1033
multilaminar epithelium4.30e-1082
cerebral cortex1.39e-0925
pallium1.39e-0925
regional part of cerebral cortex1.46e-0922
embryo2.26e-09612
blood vessel2.80e-0960
epithelial tube open at both ends2.80e-0960
blood vasculature2.80e-0960
vascular cord2.80e-0960
anterior region of body2.88e-09129
craniocervical region2.88e-09129
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.40e-0984
vessel6.04e-0969
neocortex8.37e-0920
germ layer1.82e-08604
embryonic tissue1.82e-08604
presumptive structure1.82e-08604
epiblast (generic)1.82e-08604
embryonic structure2.80e-08605
developing anatomical structure2.80e-08605
anatomical group4.20e-08626
anatomical system4.24e-08625
trunk5.32e-08216
epithelial tube6.30e-08118
cardiovascular system2.11e-07110

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.