Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3678: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=-0.

Latest revision as of 12:30, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3678_Mast_Mesenchymal_Renal_breast_Synoviocyte_myeloma_CD14



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:73874625..73874640,-p3@TRIM47
Hg19::chr17:73874641..73874653,-p5@TRIM47
Hg19::chr17:73874654..73874675,-p1@TRIM47


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical cluster4.48e-30373
anatomical conduit2.98e-25240
anatomical group5.56e-20625
anatomical system6.31e-20624
epithelium7.79e-20306
tube4.69e-19192
cell layer5.73e-19309
multi-tissue structure2.00e-17342
multi-cellular organism3.09e-17656
embryo9.14e-16592
developing anatomical structure2.24e-15581
adult organism9.70e-15114
embryonic structure9.45e-14564
germ layer1.98e-13560
germ layer / neural crest1.98e-13560
embryonic tissue1.98e-13560
presumptive structure1.98e-13560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure1.98e-13560
epiblast (generic)1.98e-13560
organ system subdivision3.10e-13223
organ part1.37e-12218
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.93e-12132
organ2.24e-11503
blood vessel endothelium2.54e-1018
endothelium2.54e-1018
cardiovascular system endothelium2.54e-1018
central nervous system2.93e-1081
epithelial tube5.03e-10117
neural tube8.07e-1056
neural rod8.07e-1056
future spinal cord8.07e-1056
neural keel8.07e-1056
compound organ1.95e-0968
neural plate2.29e-0982
presumptive neural plate2.29e-0982
ecto-epithelium2.41e-09104
squamous epithelium6.98e-0925
ectoderm-derived structure1.41e-08171
ectoderm1.41e-08171
presumptive ectoderm1.41e-08171
simple squamous epithelium1.58e-0822
regional part of nervous system1.78e-0853
regional part of brain1.78e-0853
nervous system2.64e-0889
brain5.70e-0868
future brain5.70e-0868
neurectoderm9.18e-0886
regional part of forebrain1.92e-0741
forebrain1.92e-0741
anterior neural tube1.92e-0741
future forebrain1.92e-0741
brain grey matter2.41e-0734
gray matter2.41e-0734
endoderm-derived structure3.49e-07160
endoderm3.49e-07160
presumptive endoderm3.49e-07160
telencephalon3.98e-0734
vessel8.87e-0768


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.13.22681
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.11.88666
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.14.7105
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.06172
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.11.70014
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.11.36698
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.846801
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.15.93331
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.11.70974
MA0147.11.38767
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.21.62945
MA0138.22.38017
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.21.2307
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.26.81391
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.16.26194
MA0155.11.31345
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.12.05956
MA0163.13.96434
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.22.28794
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CHD2#1106310.34402283411690.0009033701102746880.00660046669560502
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279213989643703
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324993324266397
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.032180746754904
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0320342482517395
MAFF#23764356.31535648994525.59409009993116e-060.000169002365040992
MXI1#460139.96157162875930.001011470541259020.00719744987794175
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0294253341227877
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140037965358638



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.