Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4144: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.569930354324404,0

Latest revision as of 12:40, 17 September 2013


Full id: C4144_Mesenchymal_Smooth_Renal_hepatic_Lens_epithelioid_Endothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:1748276..1748295,-p1@PXDN
Hg19::chr2:1748302..1748326,-p2@PXDN
Hg19::chr2:1748343..1748352,-p3@PXDN


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vasculature9.65e-2878
vascular system9.65e-2878
vessel2.05e-2368
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.45e-2383
epithelial tube4.87e-20117
epithelial vesicle9.40e-2078
cardiovascular system1.31e-19109
epithelial tube open at both ends1.32e-1959
blood vessel1.32e-1959
blood vasculature1.32e-1959
vascular cord1.32e-1959
circulatory system2.90e-19112
skeletal muscle tissue1.94e-1762
striated muscle tissue1.94e-1762
myotome1.94e-1762
muscle tissue3.96e-1764
musculature3.96e-1764
musculature of body3.96e-1764
mesenchyme6.82e-17160
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.82e-17160
dense mesenchyme tissue1.71e-1673
somite2.16e-1671
presomitic mesoderm2.16e-1671
presumptive segmental plate2.16e-1671
dermomyotome2.16e-1671
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.16e-1671
anatomical cluster4.23e-16373
paraxial mesoderm5.57e-1672
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.57e-1672
multilaminar epithelium7.24e-1683
unilaminar epithelium1.49e-15148
cell layer2.46e-15309
epithelium5.05e-15306
artery9.01e-1542
arterial blood vessel9.01e-1542
arterial system9.01e-1542
organism subdivision2.56e-14264
trunk mesenchyme1.17e-13122
multi-tissue structure8.25e-12342
systemic artery9.14e-1233
systemic arterial system9.14e-1233
multi-cellular organism3.41e-11656
anatomical conduit6.74e-11240
trunk8.19e-11199
aorta6.33e-0821
aortic system6.33e-0821
tube1.15e-07192
nephron epithelium2.23e-0715
renal tubule2.23e-0715
nephron tubule2.23e-0715
nephron2.23e-0715
uriniferous tubule2.23e-0715
nephrogenic mesenchyme2.23e-0715
blood vessel endothelium2.30e-0718
endothelium2.30e-0718
cardiovascular system endothelium2.30e-0718
anatomical group2.79e-07625
anatomical system3.77e-07624
parenchyma4.23e-0715
excretory tube6.98e-0716
kidney epithelium6.98e-0716
squamous epithelium9.94e-0725


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.16.06693
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.24048
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.11.62115
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.668628
MA0074.12.15449
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.13.73313
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.23.37171
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.838867
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.455568
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.23.14419
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.11.40979
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326168923918623
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.00471902092464113
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109633766216696



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.