Coexpression cluster:C1146

Full id: C1146_pineal_putamen_caudate_cerebellum_nucleus_insula_pituitary

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:62474956..62474959,-	p13@BSCL2
Hg19::chr11:62475053..62475064,-	p9@BSCL2
Hg19::chr1:67149410..67149413,+	p@chr1:67149410..67149413 +
Hg19::chr2:210636697..210636762,+	p1@UNC80
Hg19::chr3:184056614..184056641,+	p3@FAM131A
Hg19::chr4:21609132..21609144,-	p@chr4:21609132..21609144 -
Hg19::chr7:64337894..64337922,-	p@chr7:64337894..64337922 -

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

GO ID	GO name	FDR corrected p-value
GO:0030176	integral to endoplasmic reticulum membrane	0.0448502667808
GO:0031227	intrinsic to endoplasmic reticulum membrane	0.0448502667808

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
electrically responsive cell	1.02e-07	60
electrically active cell	1.02e-07	60
smooth muscle cell	2.82e-07	42
smooth muscle myoblast	2.82e-07	42

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
central nervous system	7.74e-43	82
regional part of nervous system	8.49e-42	94
nervous system	8.49e-42	94
neural tube	7.92e-41	57
neural rod	7.92e-41	57
future spinal cord	7.92e-41	57
neural keel	7.92e-41	57
regional part of brain	3.73e-38	59
brain	5.89e-37	69
future brain	5.89e-37	69
neurectoderm	1.81e-35	90
neural plate	9.50e-35	86
presumptive neural plate	9.50e-35	86
regional part of forebrain	3.42e-32	41
forebrain	3.42e-32	41
future forebrain	3.42e-32	41
anterior neural tube	7.26e-31	42
adult organism	1.44e-30	115
pre-chordal neural plate	9.54e-27	61
telencephalon	1.10e-26	34
gray matter	1.23e-26	34
brain grey matter	1.23e-26	34
ectoderm	6.51e-26	173
presumptive ectoderm	6.51e-26	173
regional part of telencephalon	7.03e-26	33
cerebral hemisphere	2.19e-25	32
ectoderm-derived structure	5.13e-25	169
anterior region of body	5.65e-24	129
craniocervical region	5.65e-24	129
head	8.22e-24	123
tube	7.21e-23	194
epithelium	1.70e-21	309
cell layer	4.83e-21	312
anatomical conduit	9.33e-21	241
anatomical cluster	1.74e-20	286
cerebral cortex	7.03e-20	25
pallium	7.03e-20	25
regional part of cerebral cortex	2.99e-18	22
neocortex	8.59e-17	20
embryo	7.70e-15	612
multi-tissue structure	1.73e-14	347
organism subdivision	4.34e-14	365
embryonic structure	2.97e-13	605
developing anatomical structure	2.97e-13	605
germ layer	6.85e-13	604
embryonic tissue	6.85e-13	604
presumptive structure	6.85e-13	604
epiblast (generic)	6.85e-13	604
multi-cellular organism	1.06e-12	659
anatomical group	1.94e-11	626
anatomical system	2.61e-11	625
posterior neural tube	7.15e-11	15
chordal neural plate	7.15e-11	15
segmental subdivision of nervous system	1.70e-09	13
segmental subdivision of hindbrain	6.61e-09	12
hindbrain	6.61e-09	12
presumptive hindbrain	6.61e-09	12
basal ganglion	2.48e-08	9
nuclear complex of neuraxis	2.48e-08	9
aggregate regional part of brain	2.48e-08	9
collection of basal ganglia	2.48e-08	9
cerebral subcortex	2.48e-08	9
nucleus of brain	3.51e-08	9
neural nucleus	3.51e-08	9
temporal lobe	3.28e-07	7
organ part	5.92e-07	219
regional part of metencephalon	6.16e-07	9
metencephalon	6.16e-07	9
future metencephalon	6.16e-07	9
diencephalon	7.00e-07	7
future diencephalon	7.00e-07	7
telencephalic nucleus	8.30e-07	7

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
CTBP2#1488	2	17.9191429540938	0.00506029706377731	0.023565004906757
JUND#3727	4	3.9969508239263	0.0101765934725977	0.0380139935507219

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.