Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1396

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:13, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1396_brain_medial_parietal_occipital_Neurons_medulloblastoma_olfactory



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:60212694..60212703,-p@chr14:60212694..60212703
-
Hg19::chr15:52101061..52101069,+p@chr15:52101061..52101069
+
Hg19::chr19:49934646..49934653,-p@chr19:49934646..49934653
-
Hg19::chr2:162281180..162281191,+p8@SLC4A10
Hg19::chr5:10992705..10992713,-p@chr5:10992705..10992713
-
Hg19::chr8:133141199..133141206,-p@chr8:133141199..133141206
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system2.45e-8053
regional part of brain2.45e-8053
neural tube8.73e-7656
neural rod8.73e-7656
future spinal cord8.73e-7656
neural keel8.73e-7656
telencephalon1.72e-7434
cerebral hemisphere1.21e-7232
regional part of forebrain1.51e-7241
forebrain1.51e-7241
anterior neural tube1.51e-7241
future forebrain1.51e-7241
regional part of cerebral cortex5.58e-7122
brain7.01e-7068
future brain7.01e-7068
neocortex1.74e-6920
brain grey matter2.88e-6834
gray matter2.88e-6834
regional part of telencephalon3.99e-6632
cerebral cortex2.55e-6225
pallium2.55e-6225
central nervous system5.25e-6281
nervous system2.65e-5589
neural plate4.18e-5082
presumptive neural plate4.18e-5082
neurectoderm1.63e-4786
pre-chordal neural plate2.27e-4761
ecto-epithelium2.68e-38104
adult organism3.27e-32114
gyrus1.27e-316
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.04e-31132
parietal lobe1.58e-265
ectoderm-derived structure3.95e-26171
ectoderm3.95e-26171
presumptive ectoderm3.95e-26171
organ system subdivision2.00e-21223
tube5.85e-18192
occipital lobe3.20e-175
frontal cortex7.24e-173
brainstem2.03e-136
anatomical conduit4.03e-13240
organ part1.21e-12218
temporal lobe2.17e-126
corpus striatum2.87e-124
striatum2.87e-124
ventral part of telencephalon2.87e-124
future corpus striatum2.87e-124
middle temporal gyrus4.89e-122
middle frontal gyrus6.76e-122
segmental subdivision of hindbrain3.58e-1012
hindbrain3.58e-1012
presumptive hindbrain3.58e-1012
anatomical cluster4.02e-10373
limbic system6.75e-105
neural nucleus2.20e-099
nucleus of brain2.20e-099
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.25e-0913
basal ganglion2.35e-099
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.35e-099
aggregate regional part of brain2.35e-099
collection of basal ganglia2.35e-099
cerebral subcortex2.35e-099
epithelium6.07e-09306
multi-tissue structure6.63e-09342
cell layer8.53e-09309
posterior neural tube4.29e-0815
chordal neural plate4.29e-0815
caudate-putamen6.43e-083
dorsal striatum6.43e-083
pons1.28e-073
medulla oblongata1.85e-073
myelencephalon1.85e-073
future myelencephalon1.85e-073
telencephalic nucleus3.34e-077
insula8.21e-071
olfactory region8.67e-071
primary subdivision of skull8.67e-071
cranium8.67e-071
neurocranium8.67e-071
chondrocranium8.67e-071
cartilaginous neurocranium8.67e-071
head paraxial mesoderm8.67e-071


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.