Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2589

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:11, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2589_neuroblastoma_occipital_small_medial_amygdala_frontal_parietal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:50575466..50575485,+p3@ELAVL4
Hg19::chr1:50575491..50575526,+p2@ELAVL4
Hg19::chr1:50575553..50575567,+p6@ELAVL4
Hg19::chr9:23826183..23826194,-p5@ELAVL2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0003730mRNA 3'-UTR binding1.31015399186089e-06
GO:0003729mRNA binding1.31249355256064e-05
GO:0003723RNA binding0.00743630928123174



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuronal stem cell1.49e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube1.11e-7356
neural rod1.11e-7356
future spinal cord1.11e-7356
neural keel1.11e-7356
central nervous system4.55e-7181
nervous system4.27e-7089
regional part of nervous system4.59e-6953
regional part of brain4.59e-6953
brain3.66e-5768
future brain3.66e-5768
regional part of forebrain9.31e-5741
forebrain9.31e-5741
anterior neural tube9.31e-5741
future forebrain9.31e-5741
brain grey matter8.33e-5034
gray matter8.33e-5034
telencephalon1.05e-4934
neural plate7.58e-4982
presumptive neural plate7.58e-4982
neurectoderm1.25e-4786
cerebral hemisphere4.24e-4732
regional part of telencephalon9.98e-4732
regional part of cerebral cortex8.27e-4022
ecto-epithelium2.54e-38104
pre-chordal neural plate7.79e-3861
cerebral cortex5.37e-3725
pallium5.37e-3725
neocortex1.57e-3620
adult organism1.48e-34114
ectoderm-derived structure3.00e-34171
ectoderm3.00e-34171
presumptive ectoderm3.00e-34171
organ system subdivision1.97e-32223
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest7.37e-30132
posterior neural tube2.60e-1715
chordal neural plate2.60e-1715
tube1.82e-15192
basal ganglion2.97e-149
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.97e-149
aggregate regional part of brain2.97e-149
collection of basal ganglia2.97e-149
cerebral subcortex2.97e-149
neural nucleus5.19e-149
nucleus of brain5.19e-149
anatomical cluster9.51e-14373
segmental subdivision of hindbrain3.86e-1312
hindbrain3.86e-1312
presumptive hindbrain3.86e-1312
temporal lobe1.18e-126
segmental subdivision of nervous system6.16e-1213
gyrus8.37e-126
organ part2.18e-11218
telencephalic nucleus4.64e-117
brainstem1.35e-106
parietal lobe3.85e-105
occipital lobe4.88e-105
anatomical conduit8.48e-10240
limbic system1.22e-095
regional part of metencephalon4.52e-099
metencephalon4.52e-099
future metencephalon4.52e-099
diencephalon1.99e-087
future diencephalon1.99e-087
germ layer2.12e-08560
germ layer / neural crest2.12e-08560
embryonic tissue2.12e-08560
presumptive structure2.12e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure2.12e-08560
epiblast (generic)2.12e-08560
epithelium2.22e-08306
embryo2.68e-08592
embryonic structure3.67e-08564
cell layer3.83e-08309
developing anatomical structure1.30e-07581
multi-tissue structure2.26e-07342
corpus striatum3.11e-074
striatum3.11e-074
ventral part of telencephalon3.11e-074
future corpus striatum3.11e-074
frontal cortex6.06e-073
organ6.22e-07503


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.