Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1079

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:40, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1079_synovial_cerebellum_small_Smooth_medulla_spinal_dura



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:146870027..146870031,-p@chr3:146870027..146870031
-
Hg19::chr3:146874115..146874120,-p@chr3:146874115..146874120
-
Hg19::chr3:147072976..147072980,-p@chr3:147072976..147072980
-
Hg19::chr3:147088169..147088187,-p@chr3:147088169..147088187
-
Hg19::chr3:147088197..147088208,-p@chr3:147088197..147088208
-
Hg19::chr3:147088209..147088251,-p@chr3:147088209..147088251
-
Hg19::chr3:147088265..147088276,-p@chr3:147088265..147088276
-
Hg19::chr3:147112252..147112256,-p@chr3:147112252..147112256
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube1.10e-8956
neural rod1.10e-8956
future spinal cord1.10e-8956
neural keel1.10e-8956
central nervous system2.44e-8081
regional part of nervous system3.37e-8053
regional part of brain3.37e-8053
brain3.39e-7568
future brain3.39e-7568
nervous system8.96e-7589
neural plate1.58e-5882
presumptive neural plate1.58e-5882
neurectoderm2.18e-5586
posterior neural tube6.48e-5315
chordal neural plate6.48e-5315
ecto-epithelium3.23e-44104
regional part of forebrain4.38e-4441
forebrain4.38e-4441
anterior neural tube4.38e-4441
future forebrain4.38e-4441
segmental subdivision of hindbrain8.31e-4312
hindbrain8.31e-4312
presumptive hindbrain8.31e-4312
brain grey matter4.79e-4134
gray matter4.79e-4134
telencephalon7.95e-4134
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.72e-3913
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest6.42e-37132
regional part of telencephalon1.52e-3532
cerebral hemisphere1.89e-3532
ectoderm-derived structure1.80e-34171
ectoderm1.80e-34171
presumptive ectoderm1.80e-34171
regional part of metencephalon1.74e-329
metencephalon1.74e-329
future metencephalon1.74e-329
neocortex2.39e-3220
regional part of cerebral cortex3.18e-2922
cerebral cortex4.01e-2925
pallium4.01e-2925
adult organism6.97e-29114
organ system subdivision3.47e-28223
pre-chordal neural plate8.58e-2861
cerebellum8.16e-236
rhombic lip8.16e-236
brainstem1.11e-216
tube4.91e-21192
cell layer9.51e-16309
anatomical conduit6.55e-15240
gyrus1.49e-136
anatomical cluster1.87e-13373
neural nucleus2.73e-139
nucleus of brain2.73e-139
epithelium4.53e-13306
medulla oblongata5.21e-123
myelencephalon5.21e-123
future myelencephalon5.21e-123
blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier8.36e-123
temporal lobe9.31e-126
spinal cord9.66e-123
dorsal region element9.66e-123
dorsum9.66e-123
pons2.05e-113
organ part4.29e-11218
parietal lobe5.06e-115
basal ganglion4.54e-099
nuclear complex of neuraxis4.54e-099
aggregate regional part of brain4.54e-099
collection of basal ganglia4.54e-099
cerebral subcortex4.54e-099
multi-tissue structure6.23e-09342
regional part of diencephalon7.76e-094
meninx1.73e-082
membrane organ1.73e-082
meningeal cluster1.73e-082
locus ceruleus2.88e-082
brainstem nucleus2.88e-082
hindbrain nucleus2.88e-082
dorsal plus ventral thalamus3.33e-082
thalamic complex3.33e-082
telencephalic nucleus7.22e-087
middle temporal gyrus1.14e-072
brain vasculature2.57e-075
occipital lobe8.25e-075


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00718652
MA0004.10.455723
MA0006.10.812175
MA0007.10.437331
MA0009.10.918715
MA0014.10.00962431
MA0017.10.337901
MA0019.10.602411
MA0024.10.813542
MA0025.11.05265
MA0027.12.5321
MA0028.10.315574
MA0029.10.832916
MA0030.10.821423
MA0031.10.756713
MA0038.10.557409
MA0040.10.838784
MA0041.12.07464
MA0042.11.12605
MA0043.10.919032
MA0046.10.90778
MA0048.10.0955945
MA0050.10.443405
MA0051.10.553205
MA0052.10.842664
MA0055.10.028436
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.0912556
MA0058.10.362328
MA0059.10.361075
MA0060.10.190336
MA0061.10.165998
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.557833
MA0067.11.23721
MA0068.10.133123
MA0069.10.903908
MA0070.10.892666
MA0071.10.518907
MA0072.10.888148
MA0073.10.0041831
MA0074.10.552456
MA0076.10.377799
MA0077.10.880402
MA0078.10.652193
MA0081.10.361233
MA0083.10.926258
MA0084.11.42483
MA0087.10.885691
MA0088.10.054222
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.391903
MA0091.10.458301
MA0092.10.421159
MA0093.10.303084
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.571227
MA0101.10.30624
MA0103.10.291333
MA0105.10.0818021
MA0106.10.59853
MA0107.10.236528
MA0108.20.753643
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.405141
MA0113.10.614917
MA0114.10.231781
MA0115.11.1606
MA0116.10.239768
MA0117.10.956472
MA0119.10.345493
MA0122.10.982472
MA0124.11.11898
MA0125.11.0347
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.670358
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.949204
MA0136.10.564434
MA0139.10.155155
MA0140.11.28413
MA0141.10.359385
MA0142.10.724856
MA0143.10.615094
MA0144.10.218541
MA0145.10.0613434
MA0146.10.00761723
MA0147.10.243042
MA0148.10.480298
MA0149.10.506665
MA0062.20.161302
MA0035.21.28264
MA0039.20.0817047
MA0138.20.653421
MA0002.21.01797
MA0137.20.321796
MA0104.20.189646
MA0047.20.586412
MA0112.20.0572179
MA0065.20.0631316
MA0150.10.386144
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.52279
MA0153.11.01778
MA0154.10.274121
MA0155.10.43752
MA0156.10.323987
MA0157.10.697424
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.243637
MA0160.10.495355
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.194027
MA0163.10.0104024
MA0164.10.627336
MA0080.20.303167
MA0018.20.599912
MA0099.20.523145
MA0079.22.25601e-06
MA0102.21.46209
MA0258.10.209744
MA0259.10.25092
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SUZ12#23512212.52894522776570.01028879170298380.0382225702225989



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.