Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2146

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:07, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2146_occipital_brain_amygdala_medial_parietal_cerebellum_temporal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:62476247..62476258,+p@chr11:62476247..62476258
+
Hg19::chr14:23817802..23817821,-p4@SLC22A17
Hg19::chr3:48016250..48016255,-p@chr3:48016250..48016255
-
Hg19::chr4:176555818..176555829,-p@chr4:176555818..176555829
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube5.19e-7456
neural rod5.19e-7456
future spinal cord5.19e-7456
neural keel5.19e-7456
central nervous system3.30e-7081
regional part of nervous system4.69e-6853
regional part of brain4.69e-6853
nervous system1.65e-6689
brain1.66e-6068
future brain1.66e-6068
regional part of forebrain5.56e-5941
forebrain5.56e-5941
anterior neural tube5.56e-5941
future forebrain5.56e-5941
brain grey matter3.79e-5634
gray matter3.79e-5634
telencephalon4.18e-5634
neural plate4.83e-5382
presumptive neural plate4.83e-5382
cerebral hemisphere1.25e-5232
regional part of telencephalon2.37e-5232
neurectoderm4.13e-5286
adult organism4.72e-52114
regional part of cerebral cortex4.75e-4522
pre-chordal neural plate3.70e-4361
neocortex9.79e-4120
ecto-epithelium1.22e-40104
cerebral cortex5.10e-3925
pallium5.10e-3925
ectoderm-derived structure5.80e-35171
ectoderm5.80e-35171
presumptive ectoderm5.80e-35171
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.71e-30132
organ system subdivision4.13e-27223
basal ganglion4.12e-199
nuclear complex of neuraxis4.12e-199
aggregate regional part of brain4.12e-199
collection of basal ganglia4.12e-199
cerebral subcortex4.12e-199
neural nucleus1.99e-189
nucleus of brain1.99e-189
posterior neural tube1.04e-1515
chordal neural plate1.04e-1515
tube1.56e-15192
anatomical cluster5.78e-15373
telencephalic nucleus9.23e-157
gyrus5.04e-146
anatomical conduit3.94e-13240
brainstem1.72e-126
temporal lobe3.15e-126
limbic system3.29e-125
parietal lobe6.43e-125
occipital lobe6.57e-125
organ part1.66e-11218
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.44e-1012
hindbrain1.44e-1012
presumptive hindbrain1.44e-1012
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.24e-0913
epithelium1.59e-09306
cell layer2.69e-09309
corpus striatum2.75e-094
striatum2.75e-094
ventral part of telencephalon2.75e-094
future corpus striatum2.75e-094
multi-tissue structure6.32e-09342
frontal cortex9.06e-083
embryo1.12e-07592
spinal cord1.92e-073
dorsal region element1.92e-073
dorsum1.92e-073
caudate-putamen2.28e-073
dorsal striatum2.28e-073
pons3.66e-073
organ4.77e-07503
medulla oblongata5.59e-073
myelencephalon5.59e-073
future myelencephalon5.59e-073
germ layer7.73e-07560
germ layer / neural crest7.73e-07560
embryonic tissue7.73e-07560
presumptive structure7.73e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure7.73e-07560
epiblast (generic)7.73e-07560
developing anatomical structure9.63e-07581


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.