Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2498

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:21, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2498_brain_postcentral_temporal_cerebellum_paracentral_frontal_occipital



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:51191299..51191310,-p@chr19:51191299..51191310
-
Hg19::chr22:32352289..32352331,-p@chr22:32352289..32352331
-
Hg19::chr7:86274120..86274137,+p8@GRM3
Hg19::chr9:137987772..137987842,-p@chr9:137987772..137987842
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system1.37e-2694
nervous system1.37e-2694
central nervous system4.71e-2682
neural tube4.34e-2557
neural rod4.34e-2557
future spinal cord4.34e-2557
neural keel4.34e-2557
brain7.74e-2269
future brain7.74e-2269
regional part of brain1.60e-2159
neurectoderm1.44e-2090
regional part of forebrain4.46e-2041
forebrain4.46e-2041
future forebrain4.46e-2041
telencephalon2.19e-1934
neural plate2.51e-1986
presumptive neural plate2.51e-1986
gray matter3.39e-1934
brain grey matter3.39e-1934
anterior neural tube7.81e-1942
regional part of telencephalon1.05e-1833
cerebral hemisphere2.84e-1832
regional part of cerebral cortex1.20e-1522
cerebral cortex1.34e-1525
pallium1.34e-1525
ectoderm3.58e-15173
presumptive ectoderm3.58e-15173
adult organism8.14e-15115
neocortex1.06e-1420
ectoderm-derived structure3.84e-14169
tube1.06e-12194
pre-chordal neural plate1.83e-1261
anatomical cluster1.58e-11286
anatomical conduit2.04e-11241
head3.23e-11123
anterior region of body9.80e-10129
craniocervical region9.80e-10129
epithelium1.87e-09309
cell layer4.53e-09312
organ part4.80e-09219
multi-cellular organism6.59e-08659
posterior neural tube1.93e-0715
chordal neural plate1.93e-0715
organism subdivision2.18e-07365


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.