Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1942: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0,

Latest revision as of 11:55, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1942_Neural_spinal_Astrocyte_Neurons_caudate_locus_medial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:57547751..57547764,-p6@HOPX
Hg19::chr4:57547773..57547780,-p12@HOPX
Hg19::chr4:57547820..57547829,-p8@HOPX
Hg19::chr4:57547870..57547873,-p11@HOPX
Hg19::chr6:111894900..111894919,-p13@TRAF3IP2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0043416regulation of skeletal muscle regeneration0.00104792181796774
GO:0051153regulation of striated muscle cell differentiation0.00104792181796774
GO:0043415positive regulation of skeletal muscle regeneration0.00104792181796774
GO:0051149positive regulation of muscle cell differentiation0.00104792181796774
GO:0051155positive regulation of striated muscle cell differentiation0.00104792181796774
GO:0051147regulation of muscle cell differentiation0.0029939301333032
GO:0043403skeletal muscle regeneration0.0029939301333032
GO:0048522positive regulation of cellular process0.00785744710401431
GO:0051146striated muscle cell differentiation0.00785744710401431
GO:0042246tissue regeneration0.00785744710401431
GO:0048518positive regulation of biological process0.00785744710401431
GO:0031099regeneration0.00785744710401431
GO:0048589developmental growth0.0149048318470955
GO:0042692muscle cell differentiation0.0164063264175261
GO:0045597positive regulation of cell differentiation0.0164063264175261
GO:0051094positive regulation of developmental process0.0222463790385095
GO:0014706striated muscle development0.0270879516452688
GO:0007507heart development0.0272617417255358
GO:0043123positive regulation of I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB cascade0.0272617417255358
GO:0043122regulation of I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB cascade0.0282493298120415
GO:0000122negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter0.0311397934867029
GO:0042060wound healing0.0311397934867029
GO:0007249I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB cascade0.0313714865634195
GO:0045595regulation of cell differentiation0.0313714865634195
GO:0009967positive regulation of signal transduction0.0319946685882814
GO:0007517muscle development0.0345747901444914
GO:0045892negative regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent0.0392769744282824
GO:0016564transcription repressor activity0.0399200397743542
GO:0050793regulation of developmental process0.0424920942631532



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
astrocyte of the cerebral cortex3.05e-103
acinar cell of salivary gland1.68e-083
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube5.24e-10056
neural rod5.24e-10056
future spinal cord5.24e-10056
neural keel5.24e-10056
central nervous system1.76e-9381
regional part of nervous system3.82e-9153
regional part of brain3.82e-9153
nervous system5.10e-8389
brain grey matter2.97e-7934
gray matter2.97e-7934
telencephalon3.58e-7934
regional part of forebrain1.42e-7741
forebrain1.42e-7741
anterior neural tube1.42e-7741
future forebrain1.42e-7741
brain5.85e-7568
future brain5.85e-7568
cerebral hemisphere3.68e-7432
regional part of telencephalon1.13e-7332
neural plate8.67e-6882
presumptive neural plate8.67e-6882
neurectoderm4.20e-6486
cerebral cortex6.91e-5625
pallium6.91e-5625
pre-chordal neural plate2.68e-5261
adult organism4.49e-52114
ecto-epithelium5.36e-51104
regional part of cerebral cortex2.30e-4722
ectoderm-derived structure2.30e-44171
ectoderm2.30e-44171
presumptive ectoderm2.30e-44171
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.48e-43132
neocortex7.74e-4220
organ system subdivision4.75e-35223
neural nucleus2.49e-249
nucleus of brain2.49e-249
basal ganglion3.12e-249
nuclear complex of neuraxis3.12e-249
aggregate regional part of brain3.12e-249
collection of basal ganglia3.12e-249
cerebral subcortex3.12e-249
tube2.00e-23192
posterior neural tube2.19e-2215
chordal neural plate2.19e-2215
anatomical conduit2.61e-19240
telencephalic nucleus6.07e-197
anatomical cluster5.06e-18373
gyrus6.13e-186
brainstem1.10e-176
limbic system4.01e-155
temporal lobe7.95e-156
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.20e-1412
hindbrain1.20e-1412
presumptive hindbrain1.20e-1412
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.09e-1313
organ part5.87e-13218
epithelium1.60e-12306
cell layer2.77e-12309
corpus striatum5.44e-124
striatum5.44e-124
ventral part of telencephalon5.44e-124
future corpus striatum5.44e-124
multi-tissue structure5.23e-11342
spinal cord1.70e-103
dorsal region element1.70e-103
dorsum1.70e-103
parietal lobe6.35e-105
frontal cortex7.07e-103
occipital lobe8.37e-105
medulla oblongata8.71e-103
myelencephalon8.71e-103
future myelencephalon8.71e-103
pons1.31e-093
caudate-putamen1.92e-093
dorsal striatum1.92e-093
germ layer7.08e-09560
germ layer / neural crest7.08e-09560
embryonic tissue7.08e-09560
presumptive structure7.08e-09560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure7.08e-09560
epiblast (generic)7.08e-09560
embryonic structure1.04e-08564
organ1.11e-08503
embryo3.48e-08592
developing anatomical structure5.14e-08581
regional part of metencephalon5.70e-089
metencephalon5.70e-089
future metencephalon5.70e-089
Ammon's horn2.87e-072
lobe parts of cerebral cortex2.87e-072
hippocampal formation2.87e-072
limbic lobe2.87e-072
locus ceruleus4.38e-072
brainstem nucleus4.38e-072
hindbrain nucleus4.38e-072
middle temporal gyrus4.94e-072
caudate nucleus5.09e-072
future caudate nucleus5.09e-072


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00991994
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.0418333
MA0017.10.496101
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.13.81938
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.10.195817
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.10.0853006
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.189508
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.247962
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.10.00220137
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.132006
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.10.175503
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.372523
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.12.75442
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.11.76068
MA0139.10.277033
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.10.356507
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.10.0359558
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.11.57313
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.20.0118463
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.30855
MA0137.20.47779
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.20.136971
MA0065.20.449243
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.172764
MA0155.10.130813
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.386729
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0592265
MA0163.10.0439995
MA0164.11.89806
MA0080.22.01584
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.20.00207114
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SPI1#668846.563458806818180.0009957429636454020.00714394445147779
STAT3#677448.415571997723390.0003771527211598630.00374424458604705



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.